Traductor

Showing posts with label prostate cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prostate cancer. Show all posts

26 March 2017

Scientists report genetic test to help predict men at most risk from aggressive prostate cancer


Scientists are reporting a test which can predict which patients are most at risk from aggressive prostate cancer, and whether they suffer an increased chance of treatment failure.  This test, reported at the European Association of Urology conference in London, and published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute*, may give men a better view on how to deal with their prostate cancer risk.
Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer, killing almost 100,000 men each year in Europe. But it is not invariably fatal, in fact more men die with prostate cancer than of prostate cancer. Current screening methods, and in particular the well known PSA blood test,  can identify prostate cancers, but are not good at identifying how dangerous they are or even whether they should be treated. This makes if difficult to identify which men with prostate cancer are at real risk and need rapid treatment, and which don’t.
Prostate cancer is has a genetic component but it has until now been impossible to understand how aggressive the cancer might be  Now a new multi-national study has discovered the basis of a simple blood test which can predict whether a man is susceptible to aggressive prostate cancer.
Recent years have seen extensive research on the genetics of prostate cancer, with over a hundred mutations identified, however most of these are only present in a small number of men. Recently there has been a particular focus on the “Kallikrein” region of chromosome 19. This is a group of 15 closely-linked genes which code for proteases – molecules which break down proteins. In fact, the well-known test for prostate cancer, the PSA test (Prostate Specific Antigen), is based on one of the Kallikrein genes, KLK3.
The researchers, led by Dr Alexandre R. Zlotta, of the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (Toronto, Canada) and Paul Boutros (Ontario Institute for Cancer Research) intensively searched for small single-point inherited mutations in the whole Kallikrein region, in a large group of 1858 men with aggressive prostate cancer (defined as having a Gleason score above 8). The men came from three independent groups, in Switzerland (part of the European Randomized Screening Study for Prostate Cancer, Pr Recker and Dr Kwiatkowski), Canada, and the USA. They were able to show that variants of the Kallikrein 6 gene were associated with more aggressive prostate cancer.
These genes are found in between 6 and 14% of men” said Alexandre Zlotta, “This makes it one of, if not the, most common genes yet found to be associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Even if we take the lower, 6% figure, then that means around 17m North American men and 22m European men carry these gene variants”.
The KLK6 variants also independently predicted treatment failure after surgery or radiation for prostate cancer in a Canadian cohort of men from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC).
Dr Zlotta said “We found that in those men with prostate cancer treated by surgery or radiation, who had these inherited gene variant mutations had a three-fold increase in the risk of treatment failure, which means that after treatment, they were three times more likely to have the cancer recurring** than the rest of the population. This is really a quite significant increase in risk. Similarly men with these gene variants were three times more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason 8 or more). To put this into context, around 10 to 15% of all prostate cancers are the aggressive prostate cancer we are dealing with here, but of course they lead to a greater mortality.
What does this mean? Firstly the test has only just been developed – it’s still science, rather than something which is generally available. So it needs to be further validated and costed. It should mean that if you have a high PSA level but are unsure about having a biopsy to confirm whether you have cancer, this test could help you decide. It also means that we can begin to look at better screening for those who are at risk, for example among those men with a family history. As the test is refined we may be able to move towards more intelligent prostate screening”.
Prof Ros Eeles of The Institute of Cancer Research London commented:
“It is very important to try to identify markers of aggressive disease in prostate cancer patients as these will help us to target treatments to those most likely to benefit. Genetics is increasingly being brought into the management pathway and this result if validated will be important in adding to the algorithm of a panel of genetic variants which may be become part of routine testing in the coming years”. 

13 March 2016

RNA sequencing opens door to accurate, highly specific test for prostate cancer‏

A study on non-coding RNA (Ribonucleic Acid) from prostate cancer patients has identified a series of new prostate cancer markers which can be found in urine. Combining these RNA markers into a single test potentially opens the door for simple, accurate non-invasive testing for prostate cancer. This work is presented at the European Association of Urology Congress in Munich.
Current tests for prostate cancer, such as the PSA and PCA3 tests, are not particularly accurate, leading to a high level of missed cancers or false positives. A test with greater specificity and accuracy may make population screening much more viable.
A group of German researchers, led by Professor Friedemann Horn (of the University of Leipzig and the Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Leipzig) and Professor Manfred Wirth (of the University of Dresden) has taken a systematic approach to identify new biomarkers, which can offer greater prostate cancer specificity.
A particular focus is non-coding RNAs. RNA serves as part of the mechanism which regulates the production of proteins from the genetic material, but until recently most scientists had felt that the great majority of RNA (‘non-coding RNA’) had no real function, and was simply accumulated ‘clutter’. Now, greater understanding of non-coding RNAs indicates that they can regulate a number of physiological and pathological processes, including development and progression of cancer, and so might serve as markers of these processes.
The team took 64 prostate biopsy samples and read 200 million sequences from each sample. They were able to identify more than 2000 genes that showed a significant difference between tumour and control samples. Several of these showed higher specificity and sensitivity than established prostate markers. One of these non-coding RNAs, designated TAPIR (Tumour-Associated Proliferation-Inducing RNA), also showed significant promise in halting cancer cell growth, although it is too early to know if this will translate into a clinically-useful target.
These biomarkers were found in urine samples of prostate cancer patients as well, and first measurements show that they allow a precise detection of prostate cancer. Based on these results, the team is working to develop a highly specific and sensitive urine-based test for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. This test will be based on a combination of several biomarkers, as this will give greater specificity than a single marker.
Commenting, Professor Wirth (author and EAU Treasurer) said:
This is early work, but it is already showing results. This is a new approach to developing diagnostic tests, and comes from applying real basic science to a practical clinical problem. Given that our initial results show a high specificity for prostate cancer in urine tests, the prospects are good that we will be able to translate this into a better test for prostate cancer. We have several good candidate biomarkers, however we are aiming to design a test which utilises a combination of biomarkers. This will give significantly better specificity than existing tests. Our work on RNAs is allowing us to design a completely new kind of prostate cancer test.”
The program is part of RIBOLUTION (RIBOnucleic acid-based diagnostic soLUTIONs), a consortium funded by the Fraunhofer Future Foundation. In this interdisciplinary consortium, five Fraunhofer institutes and several universities have collaborated to identify new RNA biomarkers and to develop novel diagnostic tests.

12 March 2016

RNA sequencing opens door to accurate, highly specific test for prostate cancer‏

A study on non-coding RNA (Ribonucleic Acid) from prostate cancer patients has identified a series of new prostate cancer markers which can be found in urine. Combining these RNA markers into a single test potentially opens the door for simple, accurate non-invasive testing for prostate cancer. This work is presented at the European Association of Urology Congress in Munich.
Current tests for prostate cancer, such as the PSA and PCA3 tests, are not particularly accurate, leading to a high level of missed cancers or false positives. A test with greater specificity and accuracy may make population screening much more viable.
A group of German researchers, led by Professor Friedemann Horn (of the University of Leipzig and the Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Leipzig) and Professor Manfred Wirth (of the University of Dresden) has taken a systematic approach to identify new biomarkers, which can offer greater prostate cancer specificity.
A particular focus is non-coding RNAs. RNA serves as part of the mechanism which regulates the production of proteins from the genetic material, but until recently most scientists had felt that the great majority of RNA (‘non-coding RNA’) had no real function, and was simply accumulated ‘clutter’. Now, greater understanding of non-coding RNAs indicates that they can regulate a number of physiological and pathological processes, including development and progression of cancer, and so might serve as markers of these processes.
The team took 64 prostate biopsy samples and read 200 million sequences from each sample. They were able to identify more than 2000 genes that showed a significant difference between tumour and control samples. Several of these showed higher specificity and sensitivity than established prostate markers. One of these non-coding RNAs, designated TAPIR (Tumour-Associated Proliferation-Inducing RNA), also showed significant promise in halting cancer cell growth, although it is too early to know if this will translate into a clinically-useful target.
These biomarkers were found in urine samples of prostate cancer patients as well, and first measurements show that they allow a precise detection of prostate cancer. Based on these results, the team is working to develop a highly specific and sensitive urine-based test for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. This test will be based on a combination of several biomarkers, as this will give greater specificity than a single marker.
Commenting, Professor Wirth (author and EAU Treasurer) said:
This is early work, but it is already showing results. This is a new approach to developing diagnostic tests, and comes from applying real basic science to a practical clinical problem. Given that our initial results show a high specificity for prostate cancer in urine tests, the prospects are good that we will be able to translate this into a better test for prostate cancer. We have several good candidate biomarkers, however we are aiming to design a test which utilises a combination of biomarkers. This will give significantly better specificity than existing tests. Our work on RNAs is allowing us to design a completely new kind of prostate cancer test.”
The program is part of RIBOLUTION (RIBOnucleic acid-based diagnostic soLUTIONs), a consortium funded by the Fraunhofer Future Foundation. In this interdisciplinary consortium, five Fraunhofer institutes and several universities have collaborated to identify new RNA biomarkers and to develop novel diagnostic tests.

22 March 2015

New results suggest combining MRI with conventional prostate surveillance may give a generally effective prostate screening system

Initial results from the Göteborg randomised screening trial indicates that using MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) alongside conventional prostate cancer screening seems to offer improved cancer detection and can help avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Prostate cancer is the third most common male cancer in Europe, accounting for over 92,000 deaths in 2012 (9% of male deaths).* Screening for prostate cancer is a controversial issue, with until recently, little clear evidence that existing screening procedures, using PSA (to be followed by biopsies), were effective. In general, either the screening has tended to miss many cancers, or to give false positives, meaning that many men are subject to invasive testing and perhaps treatment which was just not necessary.
The Göteborg Trial is the Swedish arm of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), which is the largest randomized prostate cancer screening trial in the world. In 2014 results from this trial showed a significant mortality reduction with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for men aged 55-69 years of age. Now new work, presented at the European Association of Urology Conference in Madrid, shows that using MRI may further improve the accuracy of prostate cancer screening. This research has been awarded the EAU’s First Prize for the Best Abstract by a Resident
A group of Swedish researchers, led by Prof Jonas Hugosson took 384 patients attending the Göteborg trial, and asked 124 of these to go for an MRI prior to having a biopsy. Those with a suspicious MRI, or with a PSA > 3 ng/ml, were referred for biopsy. These biopsies were both standard samples, where 10 tissue samples are taken at random from the prostate, and targeted biopsies, where samples were taken from the suspicious areas seen on the MRI.
The results showed that the combining PSA and MRI, followed by MRI-targeted biopsy only in men with suspicious MRI gave better prostate cancer detection (as confirmed by biopsy) than PSA scores alone followed by standard random biopsy (7.0% versus 5.2%). The results also showed that more significant (potentially aggressive) cancers were detected with PSA + MRI combined compared with using PSA as a stand-alone test in screening.
Analysing the results, the Göteborg group suggests that this combination may point to a strategy to maximise success in prostate cancer screening.
According to researcher, Dr Anna Grenabo-Bergdahl:
“From these initial results it looks like we can combine PSA levels with MRI scans to give more accurate screening results. This strategy would allow us to take men with lower PSA scores, and give them MRI scans, to confirm whether or not a biopsy is absolutely necessary. Another benefit is that the MRI helps us locate the suspect area, meaning that if we have to do a confirmatory biopsy, we have a much better idea of where the problem might be. This avoids patient stress, and means we are less likely to miss cancers”.
She continued:
“These results from the pilot study are very encouraging, but now they need to be confirmed. We are starting a trial of 40,000 patients in the Göteborg area. If we can replicate the results from our pilot study this may lead to a paradigm shift in future screening and fundamentally change the way we handle early detection of prostate cancer”.
Commenting, European Association of Urology Treasurer, Professor Manfred Wirth (Dresden) said:
“These initial results, which confirm some of the work we have been doing here in Dresden, show that MRI-targeted biopsy has the potential to change how we diagnose prostate cancer. There are still real issues to address; for example MRI is currently not cost-effective to use in routine screening. As the authors say, we are still some way off considering using MRI for routine screening, and we need a bigger study to validate these results. But this is a positive proof of principle, and certainly merits more investigation”.

25 November 2014

New data from a pooled analysis shows improved overall survival for prostate cancer patients treated with FIRMAGON® (degarelix) compared to LHRH agonists

New data published in the December issue of the European Journal of Urology indicates improvement in overall survival (OS) and prostate specific antigen progression free survival (PSA PFS) for degarelix (FIRMAGON®), a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, compared to commonly prescribed luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists. In addition, the data showed a reduction in the incidence of joint, musculoskeletal and urinary tract adverse events for those men with prostate cancer treated with degarelix rather than LHRH agonists. However, the overall rate of any adverse event (including hot flush and injection-site reactions) was higher in the degarelix group than the LHRH agonist group. 

Results showed a 29% improvement in PSA PFS* (p=0.017) and 53% improvement in overall survival (p=0.023) for men with prostate cancer who were treated with degarelix instead of an LHRH agonist.

Lead study author Professor Laurence Klotz, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada, said, “These pooled data showed degarelix improved overall survival rates compared to LHRH agonists. This is encouraging for physicians making treatment decisions for their prostate cancer patients.”

These findings are based on a pooled analysis of 1,925 men with prostate cancer from five prospective, phase III or IIIb randomised trials. Men requiring androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer received degarelix (n=1,266) or an existing LHRH agonist (goserelin, n=458; leuprolide, n=201). The full analysis set used for efficacy analysis consisted of 1,920 patients. Of those, 1,263 received degarelix, 456 goserelin and 201 leuprolide. Those patients being treated with degarelix received a 240 mg dose in all trials and most patients received a maintenance dose of 80 mg. The majority of patients (1,458) received treatment for one year, while the remaining patients were treated for three months.

In terms of disease-related adverse events, for those patients taking degarelix, there were significantly fewer musculoskeletal events (p=0.007) and a significantly lower incidence of any urinary tract infections (p=0.023) compared to the LHRH agonist-treated patients. In addition, in the degarelix group there were fewer patients that experienced a fracture (p=0.064) (although this was not statistically significant) and there were significantly less frequent joint-related signs and symptoms (p=0.041) compared to the LHRH agonist treatment arm.

The overall rate of any adverse event was significantly higher in the degarelix group (74%) compared to the LHRH agonist group (68%), (p=0.002). Specifically, hot flush and injection-site reactions, including pain, erythema, swelling and nodules, were more frequent in the degarelix group.


FIRMAGON® (degarelix) was approved for the treatment of advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer in both the EU and US in 2009. Today it is available in approximately 40 countries around the world, including a growing number in Asia, Latin America and the Middle East.

07 June 2012

For advanced prostate cancer, new drug slows disease



A new medication proved effective in slowing the spread of metastatic prostate cancer, while helping to maintain the quality of life, in patients with advanced disease. The phase 3 study was unblinded midway, allowing patients receiving the placebo to instead take the drug because of the favorable results. The study is the first randomized clinical trial to document expanded benefits among a particular group of prostate cancer patients in whom the disease had spread. The medication, abiraterone acetate -- marketed as Zytiga -- also delayed the development of pain and deterioration of the patients' overall condition.
The researchers say the medication could provide new treatment options.
"This drug extended lives and gave patients more time when they weren't experiencing significant pain from the disease,'' said the principal investigator of the international trial, Charles J. Ryan, MD, an associate professor of clinical medicine at the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center.
"This is an interim analysis, the final analysis should be available in 2014," he said. "But it appears that this medication may lay a foundation for the use of this drug at an earlier stage of prostate cancer, and its benefits may be able to be delivered to a much wider population of patients as a result.''
Ryan will present the data on June 2 at the 48th annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in Chicago.
Prostate cancer is the second most common form of cancer in men, with some 30,000 people annually dying from the disease. Approximately one-third of patients require no treatment, because their disease does not metastasize, or spread, while another third are treated and cured. But for the remaining patients, the cancer will recur following treatment or spread to the bones, lymph nodes or other parts of the body. Prostate cancer can turn lethal when it spreads and when it resists standard hormonal therapy.
"These results are the culmination of years of research, and will truly transform the way we take care of patients with advanced prostate cancer,'' said Eric J. Small, MD, a UCSF professor and chief of hematology and oncology at the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center. He and Ryan have collaborated on the research of this class of medication for about 9 years.
"This is a wonderful milestone in our progress in treating prostate cancer, and provides advanced prostate cancer patients everywhere with an important new weapon to fight their cancer,'' he said.
Last year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved abiraterone acetate for men whose disease had spread and who also were resistant to standard hormonal therapy, known as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and had received chemotherapy with docetaxel. The approval was based on a clinical trial that showed the effectiveness of the medication in post-chemotherapy patients with more advanced disease.
In the new trial, the patients' cancer had metastasized and had become resistant to initial hormone therapy, but they were not showing considerable symptoms from the disease and had not yet received any chemotherapy.
The study involved 1,088 men at 151 cancer facilities in North America, Europe and Australia. On average, the patients had been diagnosed with prostate cancer five years earlier.
The patients were administered Zytiga in combination with low-dose prednisone. The trial was unblinded in March after it was determined that the drug delayed the need for chemotherapy and for pain medications, improved survival and quality of life. Zytiga also slowed the spread of cancer from an average of 8 months in the placebo group compared to approximately double the time in the treatment group. The medication demonstrated such clear advantages to patients that an independent monitoring committee recommended that patients receiving the placebo be allowed to receive the active drug.
"This trial with a well-tolerated oral agent slowed the progression of the disease while helping to delay suffering and maintaining quality of life in patients with advanced prostate cancer,'' said Ryan who has been researching the drug since 2004 and helped design the phase 3 study. "These are the goals that we are moving toward in cancer treatment. The treatment of advanced prostate cancer is undergoing a rapid transformation, and this drug is a key component of that transformation.''
The medication, by Janssen Research & Development, LLC targets prostate cancer by blocking the production of hormones produced by the cancer that can stimulate its growth. The medication was first created in a British lab in the 1990s. The manufacturer warns that it should be used with caution in patients who have a history of cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, low blood potassium, and fluid retention.

Source: University of California - San Francisco

30 May 2012

Final word: Task force recommends against PSA-based screening for prostate cancer


Following a period for public comment, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released its final recommendation for prostate cancer screening. The Task Force now recommends against PSA-based screening for all men, regardless of age. The final recommendations are being published early online in the May 22 issue ofAnnals of Internal Medicine, the flagship journal of the American College of Physicians (ACP). The Task Force last published recommendations on prostate cancer screening in 2008. At the time, researchers concluded that there was no evidence to support PSA testing for men over the age of 75. An independent panel of experts reviewed evidence published since 2008 and concluded that the harms of PSA testing outweigh the benefits regardless of age. The Task Force considers health benefits and harms, but not costs, when developing recommendations.
The primary goal of prostate cancer screening programs is to save lives and prevent symptomatic disease. The Task Force considered two major trials of PSA testing in asymptomatic men to assess the life-saving benefits of PSA testing. The first trial, conducted in the U.S., did not demonstrate any prostate cancer mortality reduction as a result of screening. The second trial, conducted in seven European countries, found a reduction in prostate cancer deaths of about one death prevented per 1,000 men screened in a subgroup of men aged 55 to 69 years, mostly in two countries. Five of the seven countries reporting results did not find a statistically significant reduction in deaths.
Strong evidence shows that PSA screening is associated with significant harms. Nearly 90 percent of men with PSA-detected prostate cancer undergo early treatment with surgery, radiation, or androgen deprivation therapy. Evidence shows that up to five in 1,000 men will die within one month of prostate cancer surgery and between 10 and 70 men will survive, but suffer life-long adverse effects such urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and bowel dysfunction.
According to William J. Catalona, M.D., Medical Director of the Urological Research Foundation and author of an accompanying editorial, the Task Force recommendation has underestimated the benefits and overestimated the harms of prostate cancer screening. He and his co-authors argue that the Task Force -- whose panel does not include urologist or cancer specialists -- largely bases its recommendations on flawed studies with inadequate follow up time. In addition, the Task Force recommendations focus on mortality and do not take into consideration the substantial illness related to living with advanced cancer.
Editorial co-author, Dr. Henry Lynch, Director of the Hereditary Cancer Center at Creighton University, adds that the Task Force recommendations also leave out high-risk populations and younger men. The authors express concern that the new recommendations will take Americans back to an era when prostate cancer was often discovered at advanced, incurable stages.
"The recommendations of the USPSTF carry considerable weight with Medicare and other third-party insurers," Dr. Lynch said. "My colleagues and I strongly believe that the Task Force recommendations should not be used as justification by insurers, including Medicare, to deny diagnosis of prostate cancer to the male population at risk."
Yet, according to Otis W. Brawley, MD, MPH, Chief Medical Officer of the American Cancer Society, and author of a second accompanying commentary, overdiagnosis makes screening seem to save lives when it truly does not. Many men are diagnosed with prostate cancer that may never have progressed within their lifetime. Yet because they were screened and treated, they think screening saved their lives.
"Many people have a blind faith in early detection of cancer and subsequent aggressive medical intervention whenever cancer is found," wrote Dr. Brawley. "There is little appreciation of the harms that screening and medical interventions can cause."
In October 2011, the Task Force posted its draft recommendations for public comment. At the time, the Task Force had given PSA screening a grade "D," meaning that physicians should not offer the test because the harms outweigh the benefits. Many people who commented on the recommendations urged the Task Force to change the recommendation to a grade "C," meaning physicians could provide the test to patients who request it. However, no new evidence was presented. The recommendation remains unchanged.
While the recommendation clearly states that physicians should not offer PSA screening, the Task Force says it leaves the ultimate power in the hands of the health care providers.
"The USPSTF recognizes that clinical, policy, and coverage decisions involve more considerations than evidence alone," said Task Force Chair, Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, TX. "Clinicians and health care providers should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or situation."

02 April 2012

Metformin appeared to slow prostate cancer growth


Metformin is the most commonly prescribed medication for diabetes. Prior laboratory research has suggested that metformin may also help to improve prognosis in patients with prostate cancer by slowing the growth of the cancerous cells.
To follow up on the laboratory clues, Joshua and colleagues evaluated 22 men with confirmed prostate cancer who had been assigned up to 500 mg of metformin three times a day prior to undergoing prostatectomy.
"This gave us the ability to compare what the prostate cancer looked like when it was first diagnosed to what it looked like when the prostate cancer was removed from the body," said Joshua. "We were able to directly measure the effect of metformin on the prostate cancer."
Patients were assigned metformin for a median duration of 41 days. During that time, none of the men reported grade 3 adverse events, and all of them underwent prostatectomy with no adverse effect related to use of metformin.
The researchers found that metformin significantly reduced fasting glucose, insulin growth factor-1, body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio.
In addition, "although these are preliminary results, metformin appeared to reduce the growth rate of prostate cancer in a proportion of men," Joshua said. "Also, it appeared to reduce one of the main growth pathways that may have contributed to the overall growth of the tumor."
These results may have implications for men with prostate cancer who also have diabetes or early undiagnosed diabetes and for men with prostate cancer whose tumors have characteristics that make them sensitive to metformin, according to Joshua.
"This research builds on the hypothesis that metformin has a role in prostate cancer," he said. "Exactly what that role will be will depend on the results of the analysis currently being completed by our study team and others worldwide."
Joshua is particularly interested in better defining the precise mechanism of action and the subpopulation of patients with prostate cancer for whom metformin has the potential to improve outcomes.
This study was funded by The Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation, the Jewish General Hospital Foundation (Montreal) and the Terry Fox Foundation.

**Source: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

CONTACTO · Aviso Legal · Política de Privacidad · Política de Cookies

Copyright © Noticia de Salud